View Full Version : co angler needs boater 2007 flw tour at devils lake
walleye tom
05-18-2007, 09:20 PM
as of 5-18-2007 i talked to flw and that event does not have the boater side full. Im sitting in 34th and that is the only event that i was not confirmed for please call tom root 734-637-3828 or onewnature@wowway.com if you have not signed up and need a co angler. thank you
walleye tom
05-18-2007, 09:20 PM
as of 5-18-2007 i talked to flw and that event does not have the boater side full. Im sitting in 34th and that is the only event that i was not confirmed for please call tom root 734-637-3828 or onewnature@wowway.com if you have not signed up and need a co angler. thank you
jwhite58502
05-18-2007, 10:32 PM
I know a guy on waiting list as an Angler/Pro for DLAKE i told him about this post and he is out tonite but is gonna get to you tomorrow his name is Todd from NDAK.
good luck
jwhite58502
05-18-2007, 10:32 PM
I know a guy on waiting list as an Angler/Pro for DLAKE i told him about this post and he is out tonite but is gonna get to you tomorrow his name is Todd from NDAK.
good luck
Water Bug
05-19-2007, 08:12 AM
I bet that you got some wrong information. I know that the Devils lake tournament has been full with a waiting list on both the pro and co-angler sides for a long time. It was the first to fill in Febuary. And even if it wasn't full, priority dead line is past.
Water Bug
05-19-2007, 08:12 AM
I bet that you got some wrong information. I know that the Devils lake tournament has been full with a waiting list on both the pro and co-angler sides for a long time. It was the first to fill in Febuary. And even if it wasn't full, priority dead line is past.
Are you sure you didn't misunderstand them? Or, unless people are dropping out for some reason or another, that event was the first one with a waiting list on both the Pro and the Co sides. :confused:
Also, looking at the rules, under "Participation and Eligibility", you would have needed to find a Pro counterpart by February 12th for priority entry. As it stands right now, you would be on the "order of entry" waiting list. Even if you had until the "entry balance deadline date" of that event, that has passed too. That was May 15th.
Here's the rule in question:
2. Participation and eligibility
Anglers entering with a counterpart (pro with a co-angler, or co-angler with a pro) by February 12, 2007, will be given priority; anglers entering all four events with a counterpart by February 12, 2007, will be given top priority. All others will be confirmed in order of entry.
Maybe I'm wrong, but the way I read this is, that you would have needed to find a counterpart for this event by February 12th. Those on the waiting list above you should be given a Pro counterpart before you, if the time/date stamp "order of entry" is what it is.
Those that called in their entry early should have priority over someone who waited to enter. It wouldn't be fair otherwise.
Juls
Are you sure you didn't misunderstand them? Or, unless people are dropping out for some reason or another, that event was the first one with a waiting list on both the Pro and the Co sides. :confused:
Also, looking at the rules, under "Participation and Eligibility", you would have needed to find a Pro counterpart by February 12th for priority entry. As it stands right now, you would be on the "order of entry" waiting list. Even if you had until the "entry balance deadline date" of that event, that has passed too. That was May 15th.
Here's the rule in question:
2. Participation and eligibility
Anglers entering with a counterpart (pro with a co-angler, or co-angler with a pro) by February 12, 2007, will be given priority; anglers entering all four events with a counterpart by February 12, 2007, will be given top priority. All others will be confirmed in order of entry.
Maybe I'm wrong, but the way I read this is, that you would have needed to find a counterpart for this event by February 12th. Those on the waiting list above you should be given a Pro counterpart before you, if the time/date stamp "order of entry" is what it is.
Those that called in their entry early should have priority over someone who waited to enter. It wouldn't be fair otherwise.
Juls