bigfish1965
03-05-2002, 10:38 AM
I posted this query to the Pro Q&A but for whatever reason, it never appeared.I will ask all you guys here the same question.
I have a small non-commercial web site. On it I give specific techniques and a specific location to use them. This spot is relatively small but produces alot of HUGE walleye. ( I have caught more than 25 walleye over 12 pounds there).
I usually get an email every week or so from someone who caught their first ten pound walleye and is as happy as can be. Nearly everyone reports they practiced catch and release.
The problem is that lately I have been receiving emails that are suggesting that I stop giving away such specifics. The concern is that the location is too small and may be easily fished out.
The biggest concern is that it is a shore fishing spot and anyone can access it. I say that is the reason I should change nothing. The local Natural Resources office tol me that while they don't have much data on the walleye there ( because no one really fishes it, therefore there is little demand for monitoring).
I believe that if a situation is under-utilised and something goes wrong, there is not enough pressure on the government agencies to intercede. Ergo, the more that a spot is enjoyed, the more VOTERS that the government has to keep happy.
While I certainly don't want to see a repeat of the Bay of Quinte, I was wondering what you all think about all this before I take the site commercial?
Should I maintain the info as is, or should I change it to a technique only info page?
I have a small non-commercial web site. On it I give specific techniques and a specific location to use them. This spot is relatively small but produces alot of HUGE walleye. ( I have caught more than 25 walleye over 12 pounds there).
I usually get an email every week or so from someone who caught their first ten pound walleye and is as happy as can be. Nearly everyone reports they practiced catch and release.
The problem is that lately I have been receiving emails that are suggesting that I stop giving away such specifics. The concern is that the location is too small and may be easily fished out.
The biggest concern is that it is a shore fishing spot and anyone can access it. I say that is the reason I should change nothing. The local Natural Resources office tol me that while they don't have much data on the walleye there ( because no one really fishes it, therefore there is little demand for monitoring).
I believe that if a situation is under-utilised and something goes wrong, there is not enough pressure on the government agencies to intercede. Ergo, the more that a spot is enjoyed, the more VOTERS that the government has to keep happy.
While I certainly don't want to see a repeat of the Bay of Quinte, I was wondering what you all think about all this before I take the site commercial?
Should I maintain the info as is, or should I change it to a technique only info page?