PDA

View Full Version : Are Rangers "the best" part II


steve(IL)
04-04-2002, 03:21 PM
Some folks have gotten on me for asking this question. A few things in
my defense first - I never post under any name but my own. I've met a fair number of people who post here regularly. It's interesting that critics often post under false names. I also stated my bias regarding Rangers at the very beginning of the post.

I've owned a Tuffy, a couple low end tiller Lunds, and currently
a smaller Warrior. I've looked at used Rangers and genuinely considered purchasing a used one. Despite what you may think, I would consider buying a Ranger - new or used. I have the resources.

I am against hype. I do appreciate having the right tool for a given job. I've made my living selling tools in a very cost competitive environment where every dollar spent has to be justified. I would say that a boat qualifies as a tool. When I asked my question, I was asking about the technical stuff. Personally, I'm not interested in the image or emotional aspects.

There were a number of good responses to my original post. Thank you.
I think the best response I got was from Red Ranger. Thank you for taking the time Red. Here's what Red said:

"Well, I would like to clarify something. Back when I purchased my first Ranger, I too was curious how Ranger was making several boats at
one time, and still said "Built one at a time." The answer is really very simple. No Ranger is built until a specific order has been put in. There are literally no stock level or standard color boats built.

Even with the standard features built in, each and every boat must be ordered and the order filled out, item by item. Even if a dealer is buying a boat or two to put on the floor with no order behind them, they are ordered individually with every detail specified by the dealer ordering. Each boat ordered and built to exact order description. One order one boat, built one at a time.

Also there are never 2 or 3 or 7 of any one model all lined up and having a certain proceedure done, as an example, transom bracing. Each
boat is done individually by the transom installers and each and every
transom and transom bracing is set in by hand, and fitted for that exact boat.

That is the type of situation that follows all Rangers."

(Red, I'm Joe Blow who fishes 50 days a year. Why do I need custom or semi-custom? It's not free. As a matter of fact, it adds considerably to the cost of manufacturing. Regarding hand fitting braces, etc. - there is much hand work in building any glass boat and even aluminum boats. Ranger is not unique in this regard.)

Quality of construction.

I will not name any other brand here, as how they build their boats is up to them. Their customer satisfaction level is their concern.

(Red, you're intimating that some MFG's are a step down. Any manufacturer - whether it's Boeing, Ford, Tracker or even Ranger can run into QC problems. You're right though - companies today live or die based on their reputation. There are a gazillion satisfied boat owners out there who don't have a Ranger. Is there a problem somewhere
that we should know about?)

However, how many other walleye or bass boats have the hull cap, bonded to the hull the entire length of the boat?

(I'm not an engineer, but the above point raises questions in my mind.
On the plus side, I imagine this adds rigidity which is good. On the down side, what happens when the boat flexes going over waves? What is
stronger - The glue/joint or the glass of the hull? Which will crack first? Does the bonded joint have the same flex characteristics as the
glass? If not, that creates a lot of localized stress in that area...)

How many other boats have the floor and inner cap as one solid piece? Or have the floor and cap bonded to any part that touches the stringers or inner hull?

(I think this has to do with rigidity again. What would this do for me
and why do I need it? I know many boats ride as well or better than Rangers - somehow they are accomplishing the same thing. Other boats feel just as solid. They are either doing the same thing or something that works equally well.)

Then there is the foam flotation. You know how much Ranger uses there, especially if you have ever tried to run wires and such, yourself.

(The Coast Guard has strict regulations on flotation that all MFG's have to meet. Are you suggesting other boats are unsafe? If yes, which
ones? How much weight does this add?)

Ranger does things many others do not. As an example. Between every layer of fiberglass, black paint is applied before the next layer is set up. Why? One it makes a better looking boat and does not allow sunlight to penetrate, but more importantly, it allows the lay up crew to see every little bubble and void as the baots are hand rolled. Each layer is hand rolled, chop or roving.

(I'll take your word for it. How much does this cost?)

In the strakes, longitudinal fiberglass is layed for super strength. Many other brands may use putty or heavy resin compounds. Next time at a sport show, ask to see the sample of these rsin cased fibers. You can beat it against a steel pillar and it will not break.

(Every MFG's boats take a pounding every day and don't come apart. We'd see it at the PWT and on our own lakes if they did. It's clear that other boats are built tough too.)

Livewells and storage boxes. Bonded to the underside of the cap/floor. They are also bonded to the inner hull or completely surrounded by foam flotation. Will your dealer allow you to satnd in a livewell or jump up and down in one? I can in mine and I am a big feller.

(My livewell is extremely well insulated and I have no desire to stand
in it. Why do I need a livewell I can stand in anyway?)

Run your hand under the edge of a livewell opening, in any boat, then a Ranger. Stick your hands into storage compartments, and up near where the bok liner touches the deck. In most cases the Ranger will not fill your hand full of slivers. All these areas are cleaned up and painted for a better appearance and fit and finish.

(I just came in from the garage. I ran my hands around the inside of the livewell, baitwell & storage. All I found were smooth edges and no
splinters. I can only tell you what I found. Maybe other boats are like you described. Sounds like you should check your facts though.)

Consoles are bolted and bonded in place. Most have to be fitted to each individual boat, even with the close tolerances in engineering. Speaking of which, if Ranger has 4 molds and 4 cap molds for a specific model, they are all numbered. However the tolerances are so tight that a hull from mold 4 can have a deck/cap from mold 2 dropped right in place. Ranger also only uses a mold for a specific amount of time ar as soon as the product begins to show any deviation from the original master mold.

(My console is still exactly where it was put in '95. I don't hear any
stories about consoles flying out of other boats either.)

Livewell lids are not laid up fiberglass or aluminum. They are a composite sandwich of materials that are stronger and lighter than glass or aluminum alone. Their construction also gives them insulating ability. A strong plus on the livewells and cooler lids.

(The aluminum lids on my boat are just like new. What's wrong with aluminum? How much more $$$ for the composite?)

All hardware, all of it is corrosion resistant stainless steel. Stainless screws, stainless hinges and the like. Up front in the wiring area of the bow there is a power strip to facilitate riggin electronics, there are one or two under te dash as well.

(Adding buss bars is a nice touch. I enjoy rigging my own boats and have done the same thing.)

Every seat is custom made for each boat. The fishing chairs use a Tempress seat fram. Ranger does all the padding and upholstery. Bass boat seats are made from all composite frames and the same padding and upholstry. The vinyl used is some of the best on the market. The carpet is a heavier pile and better uv resistant than many, if not most of the other brands.

(My '95 low-end Warrior has Tempress seats and the vinyl looks great. So does the carpet - I do wash and vacuum it regularly though)

The fiberglass and polyflake colors. Each ranger has multiple striping and color schemes. Each selected by the buyer or the dealer. Each color application is called a spray. The hull is hand masked for each and every different color. A commanche bass boat can have in the neighborhood of 15 sprays. That is completely masking the hull 15 times. That is very labor intensive stuff. Yes other brands may have complicated color schemes, but few as diverse as Ranger.

(Red w/ black pinstripe or black w/ red pinstripe it's still a 620,
619, etc.)

Lets talk about the trailer. The trailer shop builds every trailer to order as well. Each and every trailer is built exactly for the boat model that it cradles. They do not build a run of trailers and then adjust bunks as needed.

The finish on a Rangertrail trailer is unbelieveably tough. The paint and primers are infared heat cured in an oven that bakes the finish on from the inside out. I have owned a few differnt brands of boat trailers as well as boats atop them. None, and I am speaking from personal experience, none have weathered as well as the Rangertrail. All the standard features on the trailers and the ability to color customise them down to the pinstriping is amazing. The axles are set up to allow for the average crown on the roadways of the country, thereby allowing better tire wear.

(I think KD made some of the best trailers ever built. It broke my heart to hear they stopped making trailers. I'm sure there are some good tarilers out there. After all, trailers are not rocket science. You make a good point though, having it set up at the factory probably
does improve the fit. The trailer on the '94 690 I looked at was rusting in the same types of places I saw on other trailers of similar
vintage.)

Lastly, I still am willing to take issue with the price point. Rangers are not much more expensive than other boats. When you compare apples to apples. A 20 foot boat must be compared to another 20 foot boat. Same options, same electronics, same power plant etc. You will see there are not many top end boat lines to far away from Rangers pricing.

(I've wondered to myself if a 20' walleye boat really needs to cost
$40k plus. I believe it's true that other manufacturers have stepped up their fit and finish to stay competitive with Ranger. Ranger clearly aims at the high end though.)

As I said, I have owned a lot of brands and a lot of boats. Ranger is the only one I have ever owned more than one of. I have never been in a more solid stable boat. Obviously many anglers who are in the market for a big glass boat feel the same way. There were over 80 Rangers in the recent MWC tourney at Spring Valley. There were 210 boats in that one. That is an impressive number to me at least.

(I'm not sure the RCL is such a good thing. I wouldn't want to only be
able to choose from R,C or L. It puts competitive fisherman under a lot of pressure to buy a boat that qualifies. A very smart marketing ploy to be sure. Ranger makes a ton of Pro-staff boats available as evidenced by the amount of turnover of late model boats. Lower tier competitive fisherman buy them up - maybe to appear more credible?
Isn't it true that R, C, or L boats have to be newer than 3 years old to qualify - or something like that? That insures competitors will have to keep trading up and puts a bunch of used stuff out there. Again, a very smart marketing ploy.)

Hey, I have always said, any boat brand is not for everyone, and every boat is as good as the owners perception of it. But these are all reasons (above) why I chose Ranger.

(I agree.... and maybe those same reasons are why I haven't bought a Ranger yet?)

BTW Steve, it is nice to have you back again, it was awful quiet at times without your thought provoking posts. Have a good one!

(Thanks Red. I did enjoy my stint in Wyoming - but it kept me hopping.)

(p.s. Some things you didn't touch on. I've heard people here on the board refer to 620's - maybe Rangers in general - as bow heavy. What do you attribute this to? Also, I've read here that Rangers are slower
with the same engine/propellor than other boats. Is this true?)

Box
04-04-2002, 04:11 PM
All I can say is WOW ;)

I thought I had some long posts now and then... hehe... Give em heck... but I just find it hard to believe that someone would *seem* so mad (that is how it looks to me, an outside observer who does not have a Ranger) at so many things about a product. If I don't like the marketing or any other aspect I just don't buy. Again, WOW ;)

-Box

Jim Ordway
04-04-2002, 04:30 PM
Steve, You are an incredibly detail oriented guy and one with obvious passion. The time you have taken to detail this last response is mind boggling. You said you are in marketing. Well, maybe I am wrong, but everyone sells the sizzle and everyone strives to establish a strong brand. Ranger has done what every marketing firm seeks. The fluff gets our attention, but the history of a successful product makes us customers. I think your suffering a little "marketing envy". Sound like a professional problem :).
Thanks for starting a new thread, scrolling the old one was getting tedious!
Good luck on whatever you end up with.

steve(IL)
04-04-2002, 05:19 PM
Hey Jim - yeah, the old post was getting a lttle hairy. For the record, I don't market or sell sizzle. I sell/market technical products that can be measured in terms of processing speeds, efficiency, HP, or length of service. I sell these products to engineers who don't give two hoots about sizzle. I break down my evaluation of boats with the same hard analysis. Which brings me back to my original question. I was interested to learn what made Rangers better besides that they say so. Red Ranger did a good job, but left me with a few questions which I hope to hear more on.

Therapist
04-04-2002, 05:20 PM
Get in line Steve.

David Anderson
04-04-2002, 05:37 PM
Steve,

Software or hardware engineers?

Al
04-04-2002, 06:48 PM
(The Coast Guard has strict regulations on flotation that all MFG's have to meet. Are you suggesting other boats are unsafe? If yes, which
ones? How much weight does this add?)

Steve buddy, they have strict regulations, but like many other regs, they go virtually unchecked. Two of my duck buddies just bought Tracker products....they have a recall on the floatation and it's pretty flakey how the factory is handling it. The dealer just gave the foam to the guys and said have at it. You think a Ranger dealer would get away with this? OMC Stratos and EB Stratos had floatation issues also. Once you are over 20 feet in lenght...the "strict" regs as you say don't apply.

One more thing, your tool analogy is different....they have to have tools, and they don't resell them with resale being a big Interest or Need. Tools, if for cutting , have a finite life....come up north and I'll show you a lot of late 70's vintage Rangers. They may not last forever, but these are going on a long time.

One thing you failed to mention in your tool analysis is the total overall cost of ownership and aquisition. Does this fit boats? I think it does. Having a stable company that has a rock solid history is worth a lot. If you've ever owned a boat by a company that didn't you'd know more about this. It's not a good experience.

Your axe should be well used by now...why not go out and play?

Quicksilver
04-04-2002, 07:19 PM
Red the Ranger Man certainly provided a number of 'technical' reasons for Ranger's quality and reputation. I bought my first Ranger in 1998 and my definition of 'quality' includes the overall buying experience and the service provided after the sale.

Ranger may be the best boat because (in addition to all those things already noted):

1. they will make a boat with your personal choice of colors, options, accessories, etc.....customized for you.
2. real people actually answer the phone at Ranger...no automated attendant, no menus. Real nice folks who can give you an answer, send you what you need, often at no cost (they replaced all my decals when I only asked for only one).

In my opinion, the very reason there are so many good boats out there today (Triton, etc.) is because they have had to follow Ranger's lead. Other manufacturers always seems to be measured against the standards set by Ranger.

Finally, I suspect no other founder of a boat company has done as much for the sport of freshwater fishing as Forrest Wood. He is also a standard against which others are measured.

Good fishing in whatever boat you own.

cardwiz
04-04-2002, 10:23 PM
I agree with the WOW.

I think some people are starting to suffer from cabin fever.

Cardwiz

PS I don't own a Ranger...and my truck is just a GMC.

Let's reverse the question...
04-05-2002, 09:48 AM
I'm not sure what you're really trying to accomplish here. In your initial thread, you complained about the edges bothering your feet, then come back in a different post and say your only complaing about their marketing, but still want reasons why people buy Rangers.

I would like to hear why you bought a Warrior since so we can all have insight into how you make your buying decisions. Many have told you their's so let's hear it. Otherwise I think this getting too personal from your point of view. My .02 worth!

john
04-05-2002, 10:38 AM
The last poster had a good point, but I'd like to take it a step further. Let's compare the Warrior 2090 tiller w/125merc and Ranger 620t with the same engine. You price them out, the price is going to be almost exactly the same - now the Ranger and Warrior cost the same, similar sized and powered identically. Now were not talking about how the little things in the Ranger that cost more, we're going to focus on the things that the Warrior has to justify it's inflated cost also. Fire away Steve.

fishhunter
04-05-2002, 11:42 AM
All new boats are overpriced but if you want something bad enough you are going to buy it. I did not have to spend $30,000+ on a boat but I wanted it, I could afford it,so I bought it. Own whatever you want and can afford and dont try to justify others purchases. You have the internet use it and compare all the boats,they all have websites..

I cant wait
04-05-2002, 02:46 PM
Why did you ask this question in the first place? I have to assume to solicit informative responses from Ranger owners, correct? Or did you ask this to solicit responses that you could attack and take issue with? Glad your happy with your Warrior, now please answer post #9 so we can all take issue with anything you say. Fair is fair.
By the way, this is one of the all time best trolls I have ever seen, congrats!

lund not ever
04-05-2002, 03:27 PM
rangers can't be the best, everyone knows that lund and crestliner are the only boats allowed on waters that actually contain fish.

Lund Guy
04-05-2002, 05:31 PM
It might take Steve a while to reply. I picture him retiring to a "war room" full of computers and advisors each time he paints himself into a corner. The last time he emerged from his war room, he and his team produced their 25 page thesis entitled "Are Rangers "the best" part II.

Good luck Steve - maybe someday you'll convince the world not to buy a Ranger. I know you'll say that isn't your goal but who's kiddin' who?

I own a Lund but if I ever decide to buy a glass boat, it will be a Ranger (or maybe a Triton). I'm impressed with them. BTW, you can find marketing ploys that are silly for any boat if you look hard enough. Even my beloved Lund has some doosies - like rivets are better because airplanes use them.

Juls_WI
04-05-2002, 06:57 PM
If you want to go for a ride in one, I'll take ya. I'll even let ya drive it! The only way to find out if you will like a boat is to take it on the water and see for yourself.

I'll be helping the PWT boys prefish for the Erie tourney the next couple of weeks, so if you got the time, I've got the boat!

You back in Ill. now? I thought you said you were moving to lower Michigan....

email me at juls@walleyecentral.com, and we'll set up a day to go out if you like... (but leave your return email, because the email that goes to that addy comes from scott@walleyecentral, so I can't just hit "reply"...thanks!)

Juls
p.s. I'm only around for another couple of weeks, and then I'm on the road until the end of June.

Brent
04-05-2002, 07:09 PM
Steve you want to know the truth I bought my ranger because it was the nicest looking boat! Imagine that! how dumb you must think I am?
but my wife also had a little to do with it to she actually was the one to suggest that we buy the ranger! and this is my first fishing boat I was a sport and speed boat man I ski, wake board,tube .I just love water and I traded my fourwinns boat this winter for a 1999 692 ranger with a 175 merc and x85 lorance lms 160 lorance all the goodies for under 21,000 and the ranger name had nothing to do with me buying the boat I could have bought any boat on the lot new or used so explain that one, or just leave it to some people like to buy nice things and no I'm not rich

RedTheRangerMan
04-05-2002, 07:58 PM
Hi Steve, It was never my intent to demean any other brand. I do believe there are many fine boats out there.

I can also blanket answer many of your rebuttals with just a couple of quick statements. I quantified my opinions in the original post as saying Rangers, or any boat are not for everybody.

You have some excellent rebuttal points as well, and I understand completely where you are coming from. I hope you can understand my side of the discussion.

As to the flexing of the console, the boat will break about as fast as the bolted, epoxied joint. I personally have never seen this happen on any brand. To break that loose a guy has to be really beating up the boat, and a lot of other things will break or fly off first.

As to the colors and hand fitting aspect, you are right, many boats are hand fitted and engineering tolerances are very close. Many boats. Not all of them. Some are truly cookie cutter boats. You are correct; a green red and yellow Ranger 620 is the same Ranger 620 as an all white one.

Where I was intending to go with the color sprays is, the lay-up and masking process is very time consuming and adds greatly to the labor cost. An all white Ranger will cost less than a fully striped and colored Ranger.

Bow heavy. The 620 being bow heavy was not a liability to me, but an asset. The bow heavy argument was also a silly one. Rangers were called bow heavy, others are too light in the bow, or too heavy in the stern. I found the weight of a full gas tank in a 620 to be too heavy, but not a problem. I just didn't fill the tank most of the time. However, I never found the weight to be a liability or dangerous. Just the nature of the boat. I also liked having that bow weight in rough water. It helps that boat absolutely crush the waves. And I never speared a wave in a 620, even with some 60+mile runs in 5 to 6 footers (US Coast Guards wave height standards). Ranger has now moved the tank back towards the middle of the 620, and overall I feel it makes for a better boat. But I will miss the extra weight in bumpy water. Either version, the pre 2002 or now, will be an excellent boat for someone looking for a 20 footer.

Speed. An elusive argument. Speed is not everything. Yes Rangers tend to be a little slower than some other boats. But then they are heavier. The same motor and prop argument is not wholly accurate. The same prop on a faster lighter boat will not be as good on a heavier boat. Also, some brands claiming faster speeds are doing so with a lot of the same type of hype you dislike. An otherwise empty boat, with an EFI will always out run a Ranger with an Opti or even an EFI. Now, load the boats equally and add bumpy water to the mix, and all things become nearly equal. Speed is also a silly reason to buy a walleye boat.

One more thing on price, you have to rig each boat, for comparison identically. I go through this at every boat show or in store. Boat X is priced 4,000 less than the 620 I am leaning on. Boat X has an EFI on it, the 620 has an Opti. Boat X has a Laser II prop (3 blade) The Ranger has a Tempest (4 Blade) Boat X's salesman is claiming lower cost and higher speed. Yes he is correct, an EFI equipped lighter boat should outrun and Opti equipped Ranger. And Boat X's prop costs less than the one on the Ranger. Does that make Boat X a bad boat, no. They (boat X's salesman) are comparing apples to oranges there.

You are also correct in that an average Joe may not need or want all the things I mentioned in a boat. Rangers are built tough. You are also correct, and I don't think you actually said it, an average Joe may not be able to see why, or justify spending the money on a Ranger. But I can tell you, many regular Joes do buy them, not just tourney folks.

As I have said, I have seen how several brands of boat are manufactured, both glass and aluminum. I urge anyone to take the Ranger tour as well as any other plant tour you can. You will learn a lot and this will help you see the difference in any boat brand.

The bottom line here, and we (I think) can both agree here, each and every boat buyer has to look at everything, and decide for themselves what is the best boat for them.

I have said it before, I think buying a boat on resale value is a silly reason, unless you are a pro that gets a new boat every year. A more reasonable reason then is how easily will the boat sell at the end of the year, based on public demand. A boat with lower resale values may sell easier based on public demand. The JD powers customer satisfaction rating, I believe is far more important to a guy who plans on owning a boat for several years. That simply means that Ranger owners surveyed had better things to say after several years of ownership. But then I have to point out, I bought both of my Rangers before the JD Powers rating were even published.

Lastly, as I said before, it is great to have you posting more often again. Always thought provoking and straightforward. I love a good debate!

Jesse-WI
04-05-2002, 10:20 PM
I second your thought. I bought my current Lund(used) before I started fishing some of the tournaments. I have gotten to ride in all kinds of boats in all kinds of weather. My next boat will be glass and it will be a Ranger 620 or Triton 205.

Jesse Fletcher
7 PWT/amateur, 1 RCL/co-angler, Lund Pro V LE 1900, Mariner 200hp & 4 stroke 9.9, Lowrance, Pinpoint , Minnkota, TR-1, Wavewackers

steve(IL)
04-06-2002, 06:31 AM
I agree. Thanks again for taking the time on answering my posts.

iamwalleye1
04-06-2002, 07:06 AM
Hey STEVE(IL)
You sure like to start a fire don't you! I can remember about two years ago we went through the same thing when you purchased your last boat. I do remember you moved away and this board really missed you! HAHA! I will give you a ride if you want and it looks like anyone that owns a ranger will do the same! Once you own one you will never purchased anything else!

Bob G2
04-06-2002, 07:28 AM
Steve,

For what it is worth, I too am one of those "Joe Blow" anglers. However, a couple of years ago, I attended the ICAST show in Chicago.
There were several top line boat manufacturers out there, so this offered a prime chance for direct comparison. I have to say that the Rangers did appear to have better fit/finish and also it appears the construction, especially the consoles, decking etc, seemed more solid
than most of the other available boats at that show. In my non-professional estimation, that is.

However, having said that, I think the answer you are looking for is a matter of value. Using that as the underlying denominator, I find most freshwater "specialty" boats to be way overpriced to when you compare them to similar salt-water rigs. Now, I know that saltwater rigs are missing features walleye fishermen desire, but since an overriding common theme seems to be "how do they handle/ride in rough water", I would believe the answer to that would be obvious.

Steve, I think you are becoming the board's iconoclast. But sometimes, these questions need to be asked. Good going.

Just a sec here
04-06-2002, 11:06 AM
I can understand you being proud of your boat and that is good. But statements like "once you've tried _____ you'll never go back", totally erases any credabilty your pride of purchase gave you. Mindless follow the sheep in front of you statements like that hurt your cause not help it. One day you'll understand how silly that comment is and realize that there are many used-to-be Ranger owners reading your comments and grinning. Lets be clear here I am not saying anything bad about the boats, they're great boats. And I can say that as I have owned them and Lunds and half a dozen other brands. All have had their ups and downs and I have caught fish out of each and everyone. Would I own another Ranger? Nope, unless it was given to me, the cost of that name is too high for me to enjoy owning it. Are you wrong to buy one?, Nope you seem to be very happy and that is all that counts.

Brent
04-06-2002, 12:26 PM
I liked your statment all the way up to (would i buy a ranger nope only if one was given to you ) that is a pretty one sided answer that is saying that you would never buy a ranger! and that all other boats are better, just for the fact being that if you had a lund, warrior, triton, alumacraft ect.. and all were the same set up and size AND THE RANGER WAS 3000.00 CHEAPER YOU STILL WOULDN'T BUY IT COME ON NOW WHO ARE WE KIDDING! like I said I like all boats, just that the ranger caught my eye, and like boats I love snowmobiles and I used to race them, would i make a statement to the fact that I would never buy a differnt brand of snowmobile uless somebody gave me one! no because like boats there all about the same.:)

Jeez!
04-06-2002, 01:05 PM
The fellow was at least dealing in the real world where rangers cost more than other brands, you flew off on a trip in the Twilight Zone!

Lighthouse
04-06-2002, 08:36 PM
Here is an interesting question.

If RCL was gone tomorrow, and the only Tournaments left required any boat BUT the Ranger, Crestliner and Lund, would those owners still be buying the "best" boats and skipping the Tournaments?


No side stepping with, I would buy a second boat and etc...

infishman
04-07-2002, 10:36 AM
Steve - Where is your answer to Question #9 ??!!??

Jim O
04-07-2002, 05:33 PM
A majority of the "RCL" type boats are owned by non RCL participants. I woul guess the answer to your question is that people have, and always will go with what they perceive as best value.
Jim Ordway

JohnF
04-07-2002, 10:34 PM
Hi Steve,

Just a Joe Blow here. I don't own a Ranger. I'm between boats as it were. I've taken a factory tour for another often talked about brand.

Recently I took a trip so that I could actually walk around in a Ranger 620. I noticed a great deal of care went into the details. For example: I found out that the Ranger folks created a place to carry my poles when I'm moving. This wasn't just a flat area with some bungee cord, but a place that is molded into the boat to cradle the rods.

The top of the bow is covered with non-slip material. I often use this part of the boat when I beach. Apparently the've noticed.

I have found that the comparably equipped glass boats are very close in price. Definately not $4K difference. (in my area)

I haven't decided which I will buy, but I am looking for the details. Let me know of those you find.

John

P.S. Now, if they could find the magic net carrying spot...

tim
04-08-2002, 06:29 PM
Steve- EVERYONE is still waiting for your answer to question #9. What's up?

Big Sky
04-09-2002, 08:21 AM
Don't think he will answer it. Exactly why I suspected his intial post wasn't sincere.