|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My vote- 41 Remington Mag.
It is accurate, good for hunting, good for self-defense, and has a good blend of knock down power without wrist busting recoil. In a double action revolver it is simple, which equates to safety and is easy to use. With a wide range of loads, including a 220 grain castcore, it can take down anything this side of Alaska. In a titanium frame, it is light and easily packable into the backcountry. I sleep better in my tent while in griz country, or in a hotel in a urban environemnt, with mine near my pillow. What do you think? |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not near enough rounds capacity, although jamproof. I opt for a semi auto in a .45 caliber.....not that much against a grizzly, but 15 fast rounds would back em down a little. Use a hydroshock in either to give a lot more stop.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
i vote for the .460 you ony get 5 shots but when you shoot a 460 how many do you need and the recoil is less then my 44
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Most usefull for what? A large frame revolver is to large to carry concealed even with a 4" barrel and a 45 or 9mm is to light for deer hunting so you need to specify what you plan on using it for.
If you're going to use it for hutning why mess with a 41 instead of a 44? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In alaska we always said "A handgun is useful in that it might give you enough time to get to a REAL gun-a rifle" LOL. It takes alot to stop a 9+ft brown bear. We always carried a .22 in our survival packs.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since I don't see myself sleeping in a tent in Griz country anytime in the near future, I'll have to go with what's useful in my neck of the woods. A small .380 (Ruger LCP or Colt Mustang Pocket Lite) comes in handy when I have to inspect "vacant" houses and buildings in the ghetto areas; small enough to easily conceal but big enough for the local "wildlife".
Hunting is a .44 Mag Thompson Contender, 14" barrel, single shot with scope. It has killed a lot of deer with the one shot. Various other calibers for target shooting. There is no "one size fits all occasions" in handguns. The .41 Mag is a nice gun but I'd go on up to the .44 if I wanted/needed a large caliber. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's my prejudices.
For everything except bears, moose, and other really big stuff, a mid-sized frame 357 Magnum revolver. For hunting medium (deer) and larger game, a large revolver chambered for a caliber that begins with a 4. For personal protection, a 1911 chambered for 45ACP. For home defense, a shotgun. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Be nice if we knew for what he was gonna use it on.
.41 is a nice caliber, unfortunately it hit between the .357 and .44, both of which have a ton of variables in the ammo department, seems the .41 never really caught on. I have a friend who hunts deer with one, seems to do well. Al
__________________
Remember our vets, they need our help, just like they helped us. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In S&W revolvers, the 41 has a reputation for excellent accuracy. Maybe it's because they build fewer of them, so spend more attention to detail.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|