Home   |  Message Board   |  Information   |  Classifieds   |  Features   |  Video  |  Boat Reviews  |  Boat DIY
SS prop for 2008 Mercury 115 EFI 4 Stroke - Walleye Message Central
Walleye Message Central

Go Back   Walleye Message Central > Boats, Motors, Electronics and Trailers > Motors and Props

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2017, 08:10 AM
Yooper61 Yooper61 is offline
Slot Fish
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 80
Default SS prop for 2008 Mercury 115 EFI 4 Stroke

Saw a thread about performance of a Lund Impact and didn't want to hijack the thread.

TMAC had commented that every motor 115 and above should have a SS prop - I do not and while the performance of my 2008 1725 Explorer has been fine, I wanted to look into a SS prop.

I currently have a Merc "Black Max" prop 13 1/4 diameter, 16 pitch 3 blade (RH) aluminum prop. Haven't had the boat out yet but performance wise, hole shot, rpms, all were Ok from what I remember.

Would the X7 SS Spitfire prop in the same pitch improve performance as mentioned in the other thread?

Also - my cavitation plate when trimmed down is just level with the bottom of the transom. The motor is mounted second hole from the top.

Should I also raise the motor 1 hole to improve performance?

The boat originally came with a 17 pitch prop and the 16 has improved rpms, hole shot, etc.

The boat has treated me well since 2008 but curious as to the SS props - Thanks
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 05-22-2017, 02:30 PM
staylor staylor is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North Tonawanda, NY, USA.
Posts: 2,546
Default

Running a 115 with a 16 pitch prop should be just fine running aluminum- unless you are running in waters with a lot of shoals or excessive sand. I really don't think you would benefit from going to SS on your rig. There is also a down-side to SS props on 4S motors- this being "prop knock", aka excessive vibration, at low speeds and when going in and out of gear. This is because a 4cyl, 4S motor fires only 2 cylinders per revolution- whereas a 4cyl 2S motor fires 4 cylinders per revolution- and spinning a heavy SS prop can set up some rather weird vibrations at low speeds on the 4S. These can be fixed, but IMHO it isn't worth the hassle when you're running a relatively low pitch prop on a rig running under 45 mph or so top end. I think you should save your money since there is little to be gained.
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2017, 06:39 AM
Yooper61 Yooper61 is offline
Slot Fish
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 80
Default

Thanks for the info. I am happy with the boats performance and where I fish the majority of the time, I don't need the extra performance, especially of it comes at a price (knocking). I travel between shallow channels going between lakes so I am often at idle speeds.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #4  
Old 05-23-2017, 08:41 AM
Plotman's Avatar
Plotman Plotman is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 394
Default

I saw no disadvantages to running a stainless prop on my 115 Merc pro guide combo. I also raised the motor to 3rd hole and it eliminated all of the torque steer at WOT and improved top end as well.
__________________
2012 Lund Alaskan 2000
2012 115 Mercury four stroke
2015 9.9 Pro Kicker
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.