Home   |  Message Board   |  Information   |  Classifieds   |  Features   |  Video  |  Boat Reviews  |  Boat DIY
.22 Magnum - Page 3 - Walleye Message Central
Walleye Message Central

Go Back   Walleye Message Central > Hunting Central > Small Game and Birds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-13-2011, 02:55 PM
yarcraft91's Avatar
yarcraft91 yarcraft91 is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in the middle of..., Michigan.
Posts: 11,488
Default

I used a .22 magnum rifle to hunt groundhogs on my dad's farm. The 40 grain JHP round would usually kill them in their tracks inside 100 yards with a head or upper body shot. Typical animal size where I hunted was 5-15 lbs.

In response to an earlier question- I have never seen an un-jacketed .22 mag round. The rifles are very easy to clean, almost no jacket material gets deposited in the rifling. I never got a "blue" patch out of mine like I do with all my centerfire rifles.

It also appears the modern .22 mag is loaded down from the ones I bought as a boy. Back then, the 40 grain load was spec'ed at 2000 fps, today more like 1800-1900.

Last edited by yarcraft91; 01-13-2011 at 03:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #22  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:46 PM
zackblain zackblain is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: finger lakes
Posts: 166
Default

http://s7.postimage.org/jravs1d6z/33...20530_1402.jpg

22 mag 115 yards. Head shot with 33 grain remington accutip (vmax)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-09-2011, 08:54 AM
Noah Cantell
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default .22 Mag. Accuracy.

Once upon a time and far away, I had a German .22 mag that could consistently print 10 shots at 150 yards, within a U.S. Quarter coin diameter. Never remember the guns you have sold. It can eat at you forever.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #24  
Old 11-10-2011, 03:56 AM
Esoxchaser Esoxchaser is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lake St. Clair
Posts: 1,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zackblain View Post
http://s7.postimage.org/jravs1d6z/33...20530_1402.jpg

22 mag 115 yards. Head shot with 33 grain remington accutip (vmax)
Savage 93F, right? Sweet shooting guns.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-24-2011, 08:19 PM
zackblain zackblain is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: finger lakes
Posts: 166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esoxchaser View Post
Savage 93F, right? Sweet shooting guns.
yeah the absolute cheapest 22 mag savage you can get, no heavy barrel or accu trigger needed to shoot straight
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-28-2011, 02:54 PM
AllenW's Avatar
AllenW AllenW is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mpls, Minn.
Posts: 11,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yarcraft91 View Post
I used a .22 magnum rifle to hunt groundhogs on my dad's farm. The 40 grain JHP round would usually kill them in their tracks inside 100 yards with a head or upper body shot. Typical animal size where I hunted was 5-15 lbs.

In response to an earlier question- I have never seen an un-jacketed .22 mag round. The rifles are very easy to clean, almost no jacket material gets deposited in the rifling. I never got a "blue" patch out of mine like I do with all my centerfire rifles.

It also appears the modern .22 mag is loaded down from the ones I bought as a boy. Back then, the 40 grain load was spec'ed at 2000 fps, today more like 1800-1900.



Wouldn't suprise me, I have reloading manuals from the 60's and they in many cases have hotter loads than the newer books.

Al
__________________
Remember our vets, they need our help, just like they helped us.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:05 PM
High Ball High Ball is offline
Minnow
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 10
Default

I can tell you that after one whole summer and fall using a .17-HMR, the wife and I went back to the .22 Magnum caliber for the varmints and critters hanging around the bird houses etc.

I shot 2 foxes on two separate times, distance was at 45 yards with the .17HMR direct hits int he front chest, drop them but they got up and made it back into the woods. I later hit a big coon 3 times before he made it to the woods, first shot was behind the shoulder, 2nd shot was quartering away and 3rd shot inthe rear. Never found that particular coon.

2 months ago I shot 4 coons in 3 nights after they chewed through the roof of one of my pigeon lofts. I used the .22-Mag and 50grn bullet. It worked like a majic wond. I shot and killed a coyote at 35 yards from inside my barn last week with the same load backed up with a Winchester 40 grn solid FMJ. However I do NOT recommend the .22-mag for coyotes, your better off with the .204 Ruger or .223 Remington caliber.

The rifles we use are Savage model 93, mine has the bull barrel with a 3x9 Bushnell mounted on top. Now at 75 yards, I can put 3 shots into the size of a quarter circle. The Savage is a very accurate rifle period! My wife's rifle is even more accurate than mine. I hope this helps you out
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-11-2012, 04:40 AM
GreatWhiteNorth517 GreatWhiteNorth517 is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 286
Default

If you really believe that a 17 grain bullet is LESS susceptible to wind drift then I have oceanfront property in Iowa to sell you. As for accuracy many of the guns that round is chambered for are semi-auto's. A semi-auto action is not the first ingredient in the recipe for an "accurate" gun.

I've seen this same discussion on other forums. Truth is, there are guys who lined up to buy a .17 HMR and think it can shoot around corners. Same thing with the .204 Ruger. Personally I'll take my .22 WMR and my .22-250 any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

I just don't believe those calibers accomplish a task that another caliber can't do. Neck something down(or up), jack up the velocity, and oh my god, everybody wants it.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-01-2012, 12:09 AM
GreatWhiteNorth517 GreatWhiteNorth517 is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noah Cantell View Post
Very good question. If you are right, the down range fp should be reduced by the number of 22's we could fit into an inch. That means if each bullet is 1/8th of an inch radius 8 X 8 = 64. 150 fp at 100 yards divided by 64 = 2 fp. That can't be right ? So maybe the mushroom effect comes into play. Maybe there is no exact answer considering bullets mushroom differently.

We have to get somebody smarter for this one.
The term "foot-pound" as a measure of force is derived from the amount of force generated by dropping a 1 pound weight from a 1 ft height. i.e. "99 ft-lbs" would be like dropping a 99 lb weight from 1 ft of height. If this doesn't sound impressive, think about putting your foot underneath that weight before you drop it.

When it comes to ballistics, the energy in ft-lbs at any given distance is measured as if all of the energy from the bullet is transferred to the target at the point of impact. This number does not take into account penetration (or lack thereof), bullet diameter, mushrooming, or other aspects of bullet design/performance. One example of this is that a high-velocity FMJ might not kill as well as a slower, expanding bullet. While the first round has lots of energy, it penetrates without expanding, goes right through the target and uses up the rest of it's energy beyond the target where it does no good. The second round has less energy, but by expanding it makes a larger hole, does more damage, and transfers all of it's energy to the target. Look at most of the "defense ammo" out there. They consist of better, expanding bullets and are not loaded to max pressure/velocity.

Sincerely,

Smarter Guy
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-13-2012, 04:10 PM
James Morris James Morris is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 544
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatWhiteNorth517 View Post
As for accuracy many of the guns that round is chambered for are semi-auto's.
The only part of your post that I'll take issue with is the sentence quoted above. Pretty difficult to find semi-auto 17HMRs around here. Seems like most are CZ, Marlin, Savage bolt actions. The round was designed as a joint effort between hornady and rifle manufacturers to deliver the ultimate in rimfire accuracy. If you don't believe it, there are plenty of shot targets out there that prove the level of accuracy it's capable of.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.