Home   |  Message Board   |  Information   |  Leader Board   |  Classifieds   |  Features   |  Video
Bottom bouncer vs. bell sinker - Walleye Message Central
Walleye Message Central

Go Back   Walleye Message Central > Walleye Message Central > Strictly Fishing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2012, 09:32 PM
REW REW is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: .
Posts: 19,447
Default Bottom bouncer vs. bell sinker

On a recent Canadian fishing trip, I ran into a situation, that I had never encountered before.

I was using a pencil style bottom weight, with a wire out the bottom of the weight. It worked great to have the bait where I wanted it to be.

My friend was using a bell sinker for the same reason. He was out fishing me by a wide margin.

I first changed my terminal spinners and beads to the same color that he was using. I noticed a slight improvement.

I was trying to see if there was anything different about our rigs, when I realized that we were using different sinkers. So, I switched from the pencil sinker - bottom bouncer style sinker to a bell sinker.

Immediate change in results. I then begin to out fish my friend.
I chatted with him for a minute and he had asked how long it was going to be before I changed my sinker. The area of Canada where we fish largely has a rock bottom. As a result, when using a bell sinker, the sinker is always knocking on the rocks as we go over them. Not so the pencil sinker which just scrapes the wire end on the rocks.

----------------
So, if you happen to be fishing a rocky bottom with bottom bouncers and find that someone is out fishing you with a bell or Lindy style sinker - change your sinker first and see what happens.

REW
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 06-16-2012, 09:50 PM
Catch'nRelease Catch'nRelease is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 274
Default

Interesting. You seem to attribute the better performance of the bell sinker on a rocky bottom to the fact that it was "knocking on the rocks". Does that mean you believe the eyes were attracted to the sound the bell sinker was making? Otherwise I don't know why there would be much of a difference if you were able to keep the bait where you wanted it to be while using the bottom bouncer. Any other theories? Could the bell sinker possibly have caused the bait to have a little different action that the fish preferred at that particular time? Or maybe there was a slight difference in the depth of the bait between the two?

P.S. I'm curious what would have been your experience if you had tried using the new Northland stainless steel stick bouncer. I just bought a couple and will be trying them out next weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2012, 10:39 PM
danforth danforth is offline
Slot Fish
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Upper Peninsula of MI.
Posts: 75
Default

I have seen this more than once where the sinker knocking the rocks or bottom will cause fish to come and investigate, where I live we fish as close as 15-20 ft. behind the boat in 3-5 ft of water due to the boat churning up the water thus making a food trail ect.
__________________
I thank God every day for our freedom and for our Armed Forces, Pray for their safety each day and thank them for their selfless time and sacrifice to our country. Without them where would our nation be? THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU DO. In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot. ~Mark Twain, Notebook, 1935
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-17-2012, 08:00 AM
REW REW is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: .
Posts: 19,447
Default

Catch,
I am virtually positive that the difference was the knocking of the sinkers on the rocks.

I am quite sure that the bait action was the same and that the depth was the same.

So, the only difference was the wire sliding on the rocks, or the sinker
banging on the rocks.

If, on the other hand, you were working a soft mud bottom, I would guess that you would be much better off with the bottom bouncer, because it wouldn't be getting stuck in the mud as easily as the bottom bouncer.

REW
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-17-2012, 11:11 AM
adempsey adempsey is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 476
Default

What about resistance? A Lindy set-up using a slip sinker would offer little resistance when the bait is taken. In a bouncer set-up the line is fixed to the bouncer, so when the bait is taken there is resistance.

I don't disagree with the noise making though. It's widely accepted to attract fish.

I picked up some of those stainless steel Slick Stick pencil weights to try this year. The best of both worlds =).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-17-2012, 11:21 AM
eriksat1 eriksat1 is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: N.W. Wisconsin
Posts: 1,883
Default

The main reason I went to bottom bouncers was because of snags, if I am getting even wire bottom bouncers snagged once in a while in the rocks a bell sinker would be snagged up in no time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-17-2012, 12:11 PM
octanehi5 octanehi5 is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hamden Ct.
Posts: 425
Default

If it is sound get a noise making worm harness,or rattleing bait. the bell will get hung up more often
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-17-2012, 02:08 PM
Winnie Winnie is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA.
Posts: 331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adempsey View Post
What about resistance? A Lindy set-up using a slip sinker would offer little resistance when the bait is taken. In a bouncer set-up the line is fixed to the bouncer, so when the bait is taken there is resistance.

I don't disagree with the noise making though. It's widely accepted to attract fish.

I picked up some of those stainless steel Slick Stick pencil weights to try this year. The best of both worlds =).
I don't think it would make a difference catching fish, but this weekend I was pulling Slow Death rigs on two rods. One had a 1 oz pencil bb, the other about a three-way rig with a 2' dropper and a 1 oz bell sinker. The bottom was pretty soft, so there wasn't much clanking into rocks, but the bell sinker had noticeably less drag than the bb.

I wonder how a disk shaped sinker would work. I would think the shape would make is less likely to snag in rocks than a bell shaped sinker. I think the thin profile would also offer less resistance than a bell. As a result, you might be able to get by with less weight in some cases. Has anyone used these kind of weights for 3-way rigging?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2012, 12:15 AM
Litchfieldwalleye's Avatar
Litchfieldwalleye Litchfieldwalleye is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 336
Default

I make 3-way sinkers out of 1/2 oz. 'ultra steel' bullet weights. They can be stacked to any weight needed (I use them from 1 oz. up to 3oz.). I use any 15# multi-strand wire (coated or uncoated), crimp the bottom below a bead (hard to see in photo, but a bead is above the crimp), and the top is looped, where a barrel swivel serves as the terminal attachment point. Cheap to make. They clack on rocks nicely, and resist snagging well, as they are flexible.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	sinker[1].jpg
Views:	128
Size:	483.5 KB
ID:	16397   Click image for larger version

Name:	sinker_end[1].jpg
Views:	122
Size:	488.7 KB
ID:	16399   Click image for larger version

Name:	sinker_top[1].jpg
Views:	109
Size:	485.9 KB
ID:	16400  
__________________
Fish control my brain

Last edited by Litchfieldwalleye; 06-20-2012 at 01:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-20-2012, 10:31 AM
dan cardinal dan cardinal is offline
Minnow
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Olney Illinois
Posts: 44
Default

REW...makes sense to me to use what is working. Obviously a bell sinker may get hung a few more times, but if it is making a significant difference in the catch ratio...then getting hung occasionally goes with it. Does these results mean a bell sinker is going to out perform a BB all the time? Absolutely not! There are bottom features and speeds that are always going to lend to a BB. My guess is, in your particular situation, you probably were utilizing a slower, more controlled drift or troll which lended to the bell sinker being the best choice.
I would agree...the bell sinker was creating more disturbance that was causing the walleye to come investigate. The same sometimes applies to jig head weight. While the preference most of the time is to use the lightest weight jig you can get away with, there are times when using a heavier jig where you would normally prefer a light jig can trigger more strikes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 AM.