Home   |  Message Board   |  Information   |  Classifieds   |  Features   |  Video
could this fish really be 17.8 lbs? - Page 2 - Walleye Message Central
Walleye Message Central

Go Back   Walleye Message Central > Walleye Message Central > Members Fishing Reports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-04-2002, 10:19 PM
Kevin/CO Kevin/CO is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Centennial, Colorado, United States.
Posts: 770
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

Weight calculator for WC says the fish should weigh 16.8 lbs, so either someone isn't so full of it or put a lot of effort into the fabrication of a story.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #12  
Old 07-04-2002, 10:19 PM
Kevin/CO Kevin/CO is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Centennial, Colorado, United States.
Posts: 770
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

Weight calculator for WC says the fish should weigh 16.8 lbs, so either someone isn't so full of it or put a lot of effort into the fabrication of a story.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-05-2002, 05:06 AM
luredaddy luredaddy is online now
Keeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: .
Posts: 434
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

When he stated that the fish made three runs of 30 to 50 yards, should be an indication that the weight should be looked at with skepticism.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-05-2002, 05:06 AM
luredaddy luredaddy is online now
Keeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: .
Posts: 434
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

When he stated that the fish made three runs of 30 to 50 yards, should be an indication that the weight should be looked at with skepticism.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-05-2002, 05:23 AM
CJW CJW is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South Bend, Indiana, USA.
Posts: 169
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

I've got a 33 incher on the wall that weighed 10.4 pounds. Looks just like what he has in his hands no bigger no smaller! I'd say someones scales are way off!! Craig
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-05-2002, 05:23 AM
CJW CJW is offline
Keeper
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South Bend, Indiana, USA.
Posts: 169
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

I've got a 33 incher on the wall that weighed 10.4 pounds. Looks just like what he has in his hands no bigger no smaller! I'd say someones scales are way off!! Craig
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-05-2002, 05:23 AM
iamwalleye1 iamwalleye1 is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: roscoe, IL, USA.
Posts: 1,589
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

It measured 33.6 in. in length and had a 23 in. girth!
Wow! Nice fish a little short!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-05-2002, 05:23 AM
iamwalleye1 iamwalleye1 is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: roscoe, IL, USA.
Posts: 1,589
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

It measured 33.6 in. in length and had a 23 in. girth!
Wow! Nice fish a little short!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-05-2002, 06:00 AM
hooked22
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

the guy holding it is 7'9" 420lbs thats why it looks small LOL hooked22
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-05-2002, 06:00 AM
hooked22
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: could this fish really be 17.8 lbs?

the guy holding it is 7'9" 420lbs thats why it looks small LOL hooked22
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM.