Un-Warranted Gov't access to private property "Open Fields"

[TimJamison11]

[QUOTE=kzoofisher;6473414]Your 4th amendment rights don't apply outside of the area immediately around your home. Simple as that. They don't apply in your car if the police believe you may be committing a crime. And they don't apply if an officer stops you because he's suspicious of you. They never apply in your boat. This isn't just about conservation officers.

A property owner might argue that the cameras provide an effectiveness and duration of surveillance that is unreasonable or impossible without the electronic device. However, if the State can show that it could accomplish the same goal through other more expensive means, like aerial photography or binoculars, there's a very good chance they'll win.

This is about law and order and catching the bad guys. If you haven't done anything wrong you have nothing to fear. Just comply and get your justice in court in the unlikely event of a mix up by the police.[/QUOTE]

It’s thinking like this that has eroded the constitution.

[Anonymouse]

[COLOR=Green][B]If Anonymouse saw a camera on his land he WOULDN'T see it before it just happened to be ACCIDENTALLY struck by the very large and heavy piece of re-bar sticking out from that side of the ATV.[/B][/COLOR]
[COLOR=Green][B]Feel badly for the owner but seriously, a person can't have eyes everywhere when navigating rough terrain.[/B][/COLOR]
[COLOR=Green][B]He/she/it should have given Anonymouse advance notice on WHERE to keep an eye open.
[/B][/COLOR]
:huh:
[COLOR=Green][B]As for a hidden camera filming Anonymouse skinny dipping, would DEFINITELY demand at least 50% of the profits from the pornhampster site it ended up on.[/B][/COLOR]
[COLOR=Green][B]Actors must be paid for their work, wouldn't you agree?[/B][/COLOR]

[kzoofisher]

[QUOTE=TimJamison11;6475144]It’s thinking like this that has eroded the constitution.[/QUOTE]

That's exactly right. Amazingly, many of the people who supported the erosion of the constitution when it was being applied to *inner city* people are shocked to find it happening to them. And they continue to offer full throated support to the Parties that want to erode our rights even further. Sad. But it's what they get told in their chosen media bubble. You know the one, it confirms their bias so completely and tells them they're so smart for knowing these things that they can't be fooled. And they lap up the lies without question and full of self satisfaction. Then they come on here and disagree with their own arguments because someone they think is from *the other team* made them.

[Clairebear]

Maybe going forward a 410 slug through the unwanted cameras would be the answer. They
are all password protected now so you wouldn't be able to view anything anyways.

[Husker525]

[QUOTE=Anonymouse;6475170][COLOR=Green][B]If Anonymouse saw a camera on his land he WOULDN'T see it before it just happened to be ACCIDENTALLY struck by the very large and heavy piece of re-bar sticking out from that side of the ATV.[/B][/COLOR]
[COLOR=Green][B]Feel badly for the owner but seriously, a person can't have eyes everywhere when navigating rough terrain.[/B][/COLOR]
[COLOR=Green][B]He/she/it should have given Anonymouse advance notice on WHERE to keep an eye open.
[/B][/COLOR]
:huh:
[COLOR=Green][B]As for a hidden camera filming Anonymouse skinny dipping, would DEFINITELY demand at least 50% of the profits from the pornhampster site it ended up on.[/B][/COLOR]
[COLOR=Green][B]Actors must be paid for their work, wouldn't you agree?[/B][/COLOR][/QUOTE]

LOL. I thought I was reading an old episode of Seinfeld when you wrote this in 3rd person. :)