Home   |  Message Board   |  Information   |  Classifieds   |  Features   |  Video  |  Boat Reviews  |  Boat DIY
Bravo 1 FS on a F250 Offshore - Walleye Message Central
Walleye Message Central

Go Back   Walleye Message Central > Boats, Motors, Electronics and Trailers > Motors and Props

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2018, 09:13 AM
LabradorHuntMaster LabradorHuntMaster is offline
Minnow
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 25
Default Bravo 1 FS on a F250 Offshore

Decided to install a Bob's action jack plate on my 2013 Ranger 620 and looking for input from others with this setup. I contacted Ranger looking for their recommendations, which is a 8" setback. My rig is on the heavy side, running 9.9 kicker, 4 group 31 batteries, terrova and enough tackle and gear in the boat to add to the weight.
I'm also looking to go to a Bravo FS prop on my rig and curious if anyone can share their knowledge with this prop on their 620 with a F250 offshore. I run two Yamaha props now, Yamaha M1 15 X 21 which I get 57-5800 RPM with 57-59MPH. This prop runs a little loose at WOT but has a decent hole shot with a heavy load. My other prop is a Yamaha Saltwater Series II SDS 15 X 21 which I get 54-5600RPM and 54-56MPH. This prop is little poochy and the hole shot is is a bit lacking with a heavy load. I do like the quiet shifting and no rattle at idle RPM's with this prop. Much of what I understand the Bravo will give me a excellent hole shot, better planing at slower speeds and controls the boat better in rough water and WOT.
What I'm attempting to achieve is the ability to fish in shallower water and fine tune a prop performance with the jack plate. Much of what I read from others is that a jack plate was the best add-on they put on their rigs and would never own another boat w/o one. The second thing is a better hole shot with a heavy load and more importantly the ability to get the boat on plane at slower speed in heavy seas. I'm not so concerned with how fast this boat can go at WOT. Any information from others would valuable.
Thanks
__________________
Diamond

2013 Ranger 620
Yamaha 250 OffShore
Yamaha T9.9
101 Terrova I-Pilot
Lowrance 12 Touch, HDS 10, HDS 8, LSS II
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 04-21-2018, 04:23 PM
hempbake1 hempbake1 is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 619
Default

20 pitch bravo fs. Mount the offshore on the plate in the third hole down on the motor. Run the plate up about 2 inches or to your liking and wait for the smiles. It works very well with this setup, from my own experience.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2018, 10:06 AM
LabradorHuntMaster LabradorHuntMaster is offline
Minnow
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 25
Default

hempbake1
Thanks for info, very useful and valuable. I know their are a few owners who have this knowledge from their experience, that is what I'm looking to learn. Did you have a 8' setback on your jack plate? Do you remember your RPM's with the Bravo 1 FS 20P? I spoke to Rick at Brainard props, he recommended a 22P with the Bravo 1 FS , one up from my 21P Yamaha 3 blade.
Thanks again
__________________
Diamond

2013 Ranger 620
Yamaha 250 OffShore
Yamaha T9.9
101 Terrova I-Pilot
Lowrance 12 Touch, HDS 10, HDS 8, LSS II
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #4  
Old 04-22-2018, 10:33 AM
Waxy Waxy is online now
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary AB Canada
Posts: 3,001
Default

If hole shot and lower planing speeds are your main goal, I’d suggest the Rev4 over the Bravo. The Bravo isn’t a great prop when it comes to those factors, it’s middle of the road. The Rev4 is the superior prop for those parameters in my experience. I’d suggest a 19, and the possibility of getting it worked by DAH or Croxton.

If you want to go Bravo, and those are your primary factors, then I’d suggest going Bravo LT. The longer tube does give you a slightly better holeshot and lower planing speeds than the FS in my experience. It’s not a huge difference, but they’re the same price, so you might as well take advantage of it. There’s no real down side on top speed either.

I would go with the 20P Bravo as hempbake recommended if hole shot and planing speed are your focus.

Waxy

Last edited by Waxy; 04-22-2018 at 10:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-22-2018, 07:48 PM
BroadwayBill's Avatar
BroadwayBill BroadwayBill is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waxy View Post
If hole shot and lower planing speeds are your main goal, I’d suggest the Rev4 over the Bravo. The Bravo isn’t a great prop when it comes to those factors, it’s middle of the road. The Rev4 is the superior prop for those parameters in my experience. I’d suggest a 19, and the possibility of getting it worked by DAH or Croxton.

If you want to go Bravo, and those are your primary factors, then I’d suggest going Bravo LT. The longer tube does give you a slightly better holeshot and lower planing speeds than the FS in my experience. It’s not a huge difference, but they’re the same price, so you might as well take advantage of it. There’s no real down side on top speed either.

I would go with the 20P Bravo as hempbake recommended if hole shot and planing speed are your focus.

Waxy
This is excellent advise. A 20 Bravo will run about the same rpms as your Saltwater II and a titch slower. I’m surprised Ricky recommended a Bravo to you when his advise to me was a Rev 4 as well. My rpms with a Saltwater II 21 are identical to you and speed is the same as well. I tried the Bravo from a friend and have a Rev 4 I’m trying to get out on the water now in a 19 to test. I’m loaded to the hilt as well with a 9.9, 360 transom and a 12 foot Talon.

Make sure to get the temp up on that Offshore before you hammer down or it will be a slug out of the hole. 112 degrees is the magic number if I remember right.

Bill

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-22-2018, 09:04 PM
hempbake1 hempbake1 is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 619
Default

6" Bobs hydraulic plate. Tried the Bravo LT 20 pitch, slightly faster holeshot and maybe a mph faster. I run at about 3000 ft elevation, so pitch is at 20 for that reason, could turn 5900 to 6000 pretty consistently. Ran a solid 58 mph with a load and touched 61 light. The guy i sold the boat to lives around Devils Lake and at that altitude he"s seen 64 mph. You can try a Rev 4, I did, never liked it. The bravo rides better in my opinion on this setup. To each his own. The yamaha will turn the bravo easier than the rev4 19. I doubt you will be disappointed with the bravo.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2018, 10:02 AM
BroadwayBill's Avatar
BroadwayBill BroadwayBill is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hempbake1 View Post
6" Bobs hydraulic plate. Tried the Bravo LT 20 pitch, slightly faster holeshot and maybe a mph faster. I run at about 3000 ft elevation, so pitch is at 20 for that reason, could turn 5900 to 6000 pretty consistently. Ran a solid 58 mph with a load and touched 61 light. The guy i sold the boat to lives around Devils Lake and at that altitude he"s seen 64 mph. You can try a Rev 4, I did, never liked it. The bravo rides better in my opinion on this setup. To each his own. The yamaha will turn the bravo easier than the rev4 19. I doubt you will be disappointed with the bravo.
Do you remember what your numbers were before the Jack? I don't think Yamaha puts enough movement options into there motor supports like you get from Merc. Therefore I feel like on these hulls they need a jack for the best performance.

Thanks for posting.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-24-2018, 06:56 AM
hempbake1 hempbake1 is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 619
Default

Numbers werent good. Holeshot sucked, 5700 rpms on the top. You're right, isnt enough holes on yamaha to get it high enough out of the water. Tried a 4 inch manual plate first and found vast improvement. Didnt even mess around, got a 6 inch hydraulic and started playing with props and height till I found what worked best. Lots of time and money but found what I needed to make it run like it should.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-24-2018, 07:43 AM
BroadwayBill's Avatar
BroadwayBill BroadwayBill is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hempbake1 View Post
Numbers werent good. Holeshot sucked, 5700 rpms on the top. You're right, isnt enough holes on yamaha to get it high enough out of the water. Tried a 4 inch manual plate first and found vast improvement. Didnt even mess around, got a 6 inch hydraulic and started playing with props and height till I found what worked best. Lots of time and money but found what I needed to make it run like it should.
Thanks for the reply.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-24-2018, 01:18 PM
SLE SLE is offline
Wallhanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Central North Dakota
Posts: 1,080
Default

If your truly don't care about top speed and you want the absolute best hole shot and boat control, Waxy hit the nail on the head with the Rev 4. The bravo is no comparison as far as boat control, responsiveness, and handling. you will give up several mph however.

I've ran the following props; 21P Stock Tempest, 21P DAH worked Tempest, 22P Enertia, 22P Bravo FS, 23P Trophy, 22P High 5, 21P Vengence, 19P Stock Rev 4, 19P DAH worked Rev 4, and a Yamaha 21M. pretty sure I'm missing one or two but at the end of the day, the Tempest and the Rev 4 are what I spent my money on to get customized. The tempest being my speed king and the Rev 4 for every day rough water and boat handling. the Bravo seem to fall somewhere in the middle. Boat control, hole shot, and handling weren't quite as good as the Rev 4 while the speed was slightly slower than my Tempest. I think with some tweaking it would be as fast as the Tempest and handle better but not as well as the Rev 4.

The rest of the those that were listed each had there own pros & cons and at the end of the day, the Rev 4, Tempest, and or Bravo would be where I'd start if I were starting from scratch. Which one would depend on what kind of performance goals I was after.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.